I've seen a number of Big Think articles lately seeking to frame the Presidential election of 2012 in grand historical terms without departing much from conventional Beltway Village assumptions. The safely conventional Jonathan Chait has produced one with 2012 or Never New York 02/26/2012.He concludes with a carefully hedged prediction that Obama will win the Presidential race and that the Republican Party will see the wisdom of High Broderism and move back to the moderation that Beltway pundits celebrate endlessly, all the while ignoring how what passes for "moderation" in Washington has moved farther and farther and farther to the right over the last three decades:On the other hand, if they [the Republicans] lose their bid to unseat Obama, they will have mortgaged their future for nothing at all.
Jonathan Chait wants Obama to wait to cut the deficit: Democrats will obtain massively greater leverage after 2012. As I've argued, if Obama refuses to accept another extension of the Bush tax cuts on income over $250,000, then Repu... Read Post
One hundred and two weeks away from the 2016 presidential elections, Fox News anchor Jon Scott this week wondered out loud if the current controversy surrounding MIT economist Jonathan Gruber and his inapt comments that the Affordab... Read Post