Post Profile






After-Birth Abortions and Infanticide, Where Does it End?

On February 23, two “ethicists” published an article in the Journal of Medical Ethics arguing for “after-birth abortion.”  In their words, “killing a newborn” should be “permissible in all cases where abortion is [permissible], including cases where the newborn is not disabled.” It’s hard to know what is more disturbing.  That two “ethicists” would argue [...]
read more

share
See more about: After Birth

Related Posts


After-Birth Abortion or Infanticide, It’s Still Killing People

Issues & Causes / Pro Life : LifeNews.com

Whether we call it infanticide or after-birth abortion, ending the life of newborns kills human beings who are moral persons because they are rational beings. There’s nothing new about arguing that not all human beings are persons w...

“Bioethicist” Upset by Public Criticism of “After-Birth Abortion” Idea

Issues & Causes / Pro Life : LifeNews.com

Last year, the Journal of Medical Ethics–a reliable fount of radicalism–published an article promoting “after-birth” abortion, e.g., infanticide–as an ethical action. It sparked a firestorm, and I was one of the match lighters, alon...

After Birth Abortions: “Ethicist” Says It’s Okay to Kill Terminally Ill Newborn Babies

Issues & Causes / Pro Life : LifeNews.com

According to Udo Schuklenk, a prominent Canadian ethicist, it is justifiable to kill terminally ill newborns who are suffering. In a paper published in the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Schuklenk wrote, “The parent...

Writers Defend Infanticide, So-Called “After-Birth Abortions”

Issues & Causes / Pro Life : LifeNews.com

In February 2012 two bioethicists provoked international outrage with an article advocating infanticide. Writing in the Journal of Medical Ethics (JME), Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva argued in ‘After-birth abortion: why sh...

Comments


Copyright © 2016 Regator, LLC