Post Profile






Managers don't have to ensure lunch, court rules

In a case that affects thousands of businesses and millions of workers, the California Supreme Court ruled Thursday that employers are under no obligation to ensure that workers take legally mandated lunch breaks. The California high court authorized a class of workers in the st …
read more

share

Related Posts


The Supreme Court ended Proposition 8. Here’s what that means.

Business & Finance : Ezra Klein (2 years ago)

The Supreme Court ruled in Hollingsworth v. Perry, the case arising from Proposition 8, the California constitutional amendment that banned same-sex marriage following a California Supreme Court ruling mandating it, that the amendme...

Employers don't have to ensure workers take breaks, court rules

United States / Los Angeles : L.A. Now (3 years ago)

California employers must make it possible for workers to take scheduled breaks but cannot be held liable if employees decide to work instead of rest, the California Supreme decided Thursday.

Working through lunch? Not the boss' problem, court rules

United States / Los Angeles : L.A. Now (3 years ago)

California employers must make it possible for workers to take scheduled breaks but cannot be held liable if employees decide to work instead of rest, the California Supreme decided Thursday. “We conclude an employer’s obligation is...

Supreme Court may hear case on school barring American flag shirts on Cinco de Mayo

Business & Finance : Money & Co (yesterday)

A California school dispute that arose when students wore shirts emblazoned with the American flag on Cinco de Mayo could prompt the Supreme Court to take a new look at free-speech rules for high schools.

American Voices: Court: Employers Don't Have To Enforce Lunch Break

Humor : The Onion (3 years ago)

The California Supreme Court ruled that employers were under no obligation to ensure workers take their legally mandated lunch breaks.

Comments



Copyright © 2015 Regator, LLC