Post Profile






The Charter of Fundamental Rights: From the Horse's mouth...

Over a year ago now, the ECJ ruled that, from December 2012, insurers can no longer offer different products and prices to men and women based on their sex, since it would constitute discrimination. We estimated that a 17 year old female driver will have to pay an extra £4,300 in insurance premiums by the time she is 26 as a consequence of the ruling.But, aside from the practical cost and barmy nature of the ruling itself (given that, for example, evidence suggests that, on average, female and male drivers present different degrees of risk), we pointed to a more fundamental issue of democracy.
read more

share

Related Posts


Black Women Still Suffer From Wage Gaps

Business & Finance : Huffington Post: Business Blog

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VII reads as follows: "Prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin." As you are already aware, the Civil Rights act just turned 50 years old this mon...

Why estimates never work - Brandon Savage

Programming / Web Development : Planet PHP

Somewhere, right now, a project manager is compiling estimates on a software project and coming up with a completion date based on “velocity” and “scope”. When they’re done, they’ll take their completed work and show it to their bos...

Two Cheers for Lifting the Ban on Women in Combat

News : Reason

Women and men are entitled to the same rights, period. Discriminating against an individual solely based on his or her sex is wrong and if you do that you are not my friend. So my initial reaction yesterday to reports that the Penta...

Is There a Constitutional Right to Smoke in the Park?

News : Reason

Last week a federal appeals court rejected a constitutional challenge to an outdoor smoking ban in Clayton, Missouri, ruling that inhaling tobacco combustion products in public parks does not qualify as a "fundamental right." I tend...

‘No fundamental rights are burdened’ by Nevada amendment defending marriage, judge rules

Issues & Causes / Pro Life : LifeSiteNews

by Ben Johnson LAS VEGAS, December 3, 2012, (LifeSiteNews.com) – A Nevada judge has ruled that “no fundamental rights are burdened” by Nevada’s constitutional amendment restricting marriage to one man and one woman – a ruling that h...

Comments



Copyright © 2015 Regator, LLC