Post Profile

Was Bertrand Russell and Empiricist?

He is often portrayed as one. However, consider this from the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Here. c. A Priori Principles Against logical positivism, Russell thinks that to defend the very possibility of objective knowledge it is necessary to permit knowledge to rest in part on non-empirical propositions. In Inquiry into Meaning and Truth (1940) and Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits (1948) Russell views the claim that all knowledge is derived from experience as self-refuting and hence inadequate to a theory of knowledge: as David Hume showed, empiricism uses principles of reason that cannot be proved by experience.
read more


Related Posts

The Stanford Encyclopedia Entry on Modal Logic

Academics / Philosophy : Dangerous Idea

Here is the Stanford Encyclopedia entry on Modal Logic. There is no mention that I can see that it is even used in theology or philosophy of religion.

Motives and arguments

Academics / Philosophy : Dangerous Idea

I've been acutely aware, since I was 18, of the wishful thinking charge against Christianity, when I read Bertrand Russell, and that is one of the main reasons I majored in philosophy as an undergraduate. If there were reasons to re...

Bertrand Russell on Arabic Philosophy

Academics / Philosophy : Maverick Philosopher

The following passage is from Bertrand Russell, A History of Western Philosophy (New York: Simon & Shuster, 1945), p. 427. I found it here, but without a link and without a reference. So, exploiting the resources of my well-stocked ...

Should One Stoop to a Defense of Philosophy or the Humanities?

Academics / Philosophy : Maverick Philosopher

The place of philosophy in college curricula is often defended on the ground that its study promotes critical thinking. Now I don't doubt that courses in logic, epistemology, and ethics can help inculcate habits of critical thinking...

The confirmatory fine-tuning argument

Academics / Philosophy : Dangerous Idea

From the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Robin Collins defends a more modest version of the fine-tuning argument that relies on a general principle of confirmation theory, rather than a principle that is contrived to distinguis...


Copyright © 2016 Regator, LLC