Post Profile

What Lester Holt Got Wrong About Stop-and-Frisk in the Presidential Debate

The tactic is constitutional, but its use in New York might not have been.
read more

See more about: Lester Holt

Related Posts

HAH! Cavuto Just EXPOSED Lester Holt’s LIES During Debate – The Asshat Just Got FACT CHECKED! [VIDEO]

US Politics / Conservative : Right Wing News

It was obvious to many that Lester Holt was in the tank for Hillary Clinton during the first presidential debate. He constantly interrupted Donald Trump and pretty much let Hillary

Christie on Trump-Clinton debate: Lester Holt is an ‘idiot’

News : The Raw Story

TRENTON — Gov. Chris Christie on Tuesday defended Donald Trump’s performance in his first presidential debate against Hillary Clinton — and added the event’s moderator, Lester Holt, to the list of people he’s called an “idiot.” Some...

Lester Holt Challenges Trump on Stop and Frisk: ‘It Was Ruled Unconstitutional’ ‘You’re Wrong’

News : Mediaite

During the 2016 Presidential Debate tonight at Hofsta University, Lester Holt offered a challenge towards Donald Trump over his recent suggestions to bring back stop-and-frisk as a national policy to reduce crime.

Not only is 'stop and frisk' unconstitutional, it doesn't work, no matter what Trump or Giuliani say

US Politics / Liberal : Daily Kos

There are almost as many things wrong with Donald Trump’s defense of expanding “stop and frisk” as there are words in this back and forth between Trump and moderator Lester Holt. HOLT: Your two -- your two minutes expired, but I do ...

Trump’s false claim that stop and frisk in NYC wasn’t ruled unconstitutional

Politics / US Politics : Fact Checker

Moderator Lester Holt: “Stop and frisk was ruled unconstitutional in New York, because it largely singled out black and Hispanic young men.” Donald Trump: “No, you’re wrong. It went before a judge, who was a very against-police judg...


Copyright © 2016 Regator, LLC