Post Profile






What Election 2016 Could Mean For The Supreme Court

Which precedents are in danger of getting overruled in the next few years?
read more

share
See more about: Supreme Court

Related Posts


WSJ Upset Supreme Court Didn't Destroy Class Action Lawsuits In Halliburton

US Politics / Liberal : Media Matters for America

The Wall Street Journal is criticizing the Supreme Court's recent securities class action decision which refused to overrule 25 years of precedent because of the "mischief" of successful investor class actions, even though the Court...

Michigan Supreme Court Reaffirms Right to Physically (But Nonlethally) Resist Illegal Police Conduct

Industries / Law : The Volokh Conspiracy

(Eugene Volokh) The case is People v. Moreno (Mich. Apr. 23, 2012) (5 to 2). A 2004 Michigan Court of Appeals decision had held the contrary, but the Michigan Supreme Court overruled that precedent. Under the old common law rule, pe...

The Supreme Court, Spider-Man and ‘Stare Decisis’

Industries / Law : Law Blog - WSJ.com

The Supreme Court said Friday it would use a patent case about a Spider-Man gadget to consider overruling a 50-year-old precedent that bars the collection of royalties on patents after they expire. The court agreed to review an appe...

Electronic voting machines suck, the comprehensive 2016 election edition

Humor / odd : Boing Boing

It's been thirteen years since we started writing here about the shenanigans of the electronic voting machine industry, who were given a gift when, after the contested 2000 elections, Congress and the Supreme Court signaled that ele...

Supreme Court Sticks to Precedent in Spider-Man Toy Case

Industries / Law : Law Blog - WSJ.com

An inventor of a Spider-Man toy gadget will remain bound by a web of precedent on patent royalties, after the Supreme Court on Monday declined to overrule a 50-year-old decision that had come under heavy criticism.

Comments


Copyright © 2016 Regator, LLC