Post Profile

Relying on future tech to suck up carbon is rolling the dice with the planet

Scientists are trying to develop negative-emissions technologies. Will they work?
read more


Related Posts

Cool Planet Energy’s Carbon Negative Biofuel Costs Just $1.50 Per Gallon

Lifestyle / Green Living : Inhabitat

In a warming world, every gas-powered vehicle contributes to CO2 emissions. California-based Cool Planet Energy not only believes they have a low-cost alternative to gasoline, but one that is actually carbon negative. They have deve...

Energy Quote of the Day: On 'No Regret' Negative Emissions Technologies

Utilities / Energy : The Energy Collective

A new report from Oxford University says that the most promising “Negative Emissions Technologies” (NETs) for removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere in the near term are also among the simplest: afforestation, soil carbon impro...

Exxon and FuelCell to study capturing carbon emissions

Technology : SFGate: Tech News

The companies will try to develop technology that uses carbonate fuel cells to generate power while capturing carbon dioxide, which scientists say is the most prevalent greenhouse gas responsible for climate change. Officials in sev...

If Cutting Carbon Emissions Isn't Working, What's Next?

Issues & Causes / Environmentalism : NYTimes: Environment

In a new e-book, a journalist writes that if cutting carbon dioxide emissions isn't working, nations should consider atmospheric geoengineering or sucking carbon dioxide molecules out of the air.

A reliance on negative emissions technologies is locking in carbon addiction

Issues & Causes / Environmentalism : Physorg: Earth

The Paris Agreement on climate change and the carbon-reduction plans of many governments (including the UK) are unwittingly reliant on unproven technologies to suck hundreds of billions of tonnes of carbon dioxide directly from the ...


Copyright © 2016 Regator, LLC