Post Profile






The CBO and Super Silver Gapping

Kevin Drum asked for a blog post instead of a tweet storm regarding my argument that over the long run not paying the Cost Sharing Reduction (CSR) subsidies is a massive liberal policy win. So here it goes. Under current law, there are two sets of subsidies. The first is Premium Tax Credits. These apply […]
read more

share

Related Posts


Chart of the Day: Killing CSR Subsidies Will Cost $194 Billion—But Maybe That’s a Good Thing

Politics / US Politics : Kevin Drum

Here’s one of the most remarkable charts you’re ever likely to see: This comes from a new CBO report on the likely effects of eliminating Obamacare’s CSR subsidies. Basically, the federal government would save money by not paying th...

CSR Cash day

Politics / US Politics : Balloon Juice

Today was the day when Cost Sharing Reduction (CSR) subsidies were to be paid for insurers. The CSR obligation was incurred by the federal government on February 1st for all CSR qualified policies in effect for the month of February...

CSR non-payment and a silly Silver Gap idea

Politics / US Politics : Balloon Juice

The Cost Sharing Reduction Sword of Damocles hanging over the Exchanges for 2017. If CSR blows up in before December 2017, the Exchanges are destroyed for 2017. However if insurers assume that CSR will not be paid in 2018, they migh...

CSR and the policy of intertia

Politics / US Politics : Balloon Juice

Andrew Sprung at Xpostfactoid asks a common question about Cost Sharing Reduction (CSR) subsidies.   the primary agenda for Democrats is obvious: appropriate funding for Cost Sharing Reduction payments and for some kind of reinsuran...

CSR, 1332 and effective utilization

Politics / US Politics : Balloon Juice

Andrew Sprung at Xpostfactoid has pushed back on my argument that Democrats have the advantage of inertia on the CSR funding argument. He raises an excellent point. 1. Cost. CBO projects premium increases of 20% right off the bat in...

Comments


Copyright © 2016 Regator, LLC