by Dan Savage
During oral arguments before the Supreme Court yesterday about a homophobic baker in Colorado and the wedding cake he refused to sell to a gay couple there—a case that could gut civil rights protections for LGBT people (things don't look good, says Mark Joseph Stern at Slate)—a Trump administration lawyer argued that bakers should be legally allowed put signs in their windows saying that they don't make cakes for gay weddings.
The biggest religious freedom case of 2017, Masterpiece Cakeshop, begins oral arguments today. The case of a Christian baker in Colorado who refused to make a cake for a same-sex wedding gets its big day in court today. While Jack P...
(Paul Mirengoff) The Supreme Court heard oral argument today in the Colorado cake maker case. The issue is whether Colorado can coerce a baker, Jack Phillips, into making a custom cake for a gay wedding when he objects to gay marria...
Justices heard arguments in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, which centers on a baker who refused to make a cake for a same-sex wedding.
The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in a case Tuesday that asks whether a baker in Colorado can legally ignore his state’s non-discrimination law by refusing to bake a wedding cake for a same-sex couple.