Post Profile

Macro needs micro

Most macroeconomists have accepted that their tools need to incorporate more real world phenomena, such as financial intermediation and labor market frictions. Fabio Ghironi discusses the need to incorporate more microeconomics to macroeconomics. Interviewer: Tim Phillips
read more


Related Posts

Bill Woolsey on micro vs. macro

Business & Finance / Economics : TheMoneyIllusion

Here’s Bill Woolsey: I sometimes have the impression that microeconomists smugly look down upon macroeconomists.    Microeconomics is scientific and empirical.   Macroeconomics is a mess of conflicting theories that apparently canno...

Introduction: Macroeconomic Outlook for Crowdfunding

Business & Finance : Huffington Post: Business Blog

To better prepare the reader for a series of discussions about the macro and microeconomics of the crowdfunding space (relative to Patch of Land's unique offering in the real estate markets), it has become essential that we consider...

Should new editions of intermediate microeconomics textbooks be banned?

Business & Finance / Economics : Worthwhile Canadian Initiative

The basic content of intermediate micro - choice theory, theory of the firm, market equilibrium - has not changed for decades. The latest Intermediate micro textbooks cover substantially the same material - indifference curves, budg...

Why macroeconomists need to study history

Business & Finance / Economics : TheMoneyIllusion

One of the ways that macro differs from micro is that macro is essentially a branch of history.  Micro is not.  And yet today’s macroeconomists often have not studied monetary history.  Marcus Nunes and Ramesh Ponnuru directed me to...

The Real Problem with Microfoundations

Business & Finance : EconoSpeak

Suppose you lived in a world in which there were two branches of economics, micro and macro. Microeconomics in this world is rigorous, precise, honed over many decades of increasingly sophisticated analysis, and confirmed in almost ...


Copyright © 2016 Regator, LLC