Post Profile

Looking Back on Lucas

Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Commission was the high-water mark of the Supreme Court’s expansion of the takings clause, which makes it unconstitutional for the government to take private property without compensation. Lucas epitomized the late Justice Scalia’s crusade to limit government regulation of property. The decision left environmentalists and regulators quaking in their boots,
read more


Related Posts

New at Reason: Damon Root on Rent Control and the Takings Clause

News : Reason

According to the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment, “private property [shall not] be taken for public use without just compensation.” But what happens when government regulations violate property rights? Do regulatory takings re...

Damon Root on Protecting Property Rights from the Army Corps of Engineers

News : Reason

The Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment provides that if private property is “taken for public use,” the government must pay “just compensation” to the owner. On October 3, he U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a case t...

Supreme Court Questions Federal Government’s Narrow Reading of the Takings Clause

News : Reason

The Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment requires the government to pay just compensation when it takes property for a public use. Arguing before the U.S. Supreme Court yesterday morning in the case of Arkansas Game & Fish Commissi...

SCOTUS Agrees to Review Government’s Uncompensated Taking of Raisin Crop in Major Property Rights Case

News : Reason

The Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment forbids the government from taking private for property for a public use without the payment of just compensation. Yet in May 2014 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit upheld the fe...

Supreme Court Rules for Property Owner in Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District

Issues & Causes / Environmentalism : Legal Planet: Environmental Law and Policy

The U.S. Supreme Court today decided Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District. But unlike the previous two, unanimous Takings Clause rulings issued this Term by the justices in Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. United ...


Copyright © 2016 Regator, LLC