Post Profile

Recreating the Jim Crow Electorate in Arkansas

John Roberts, writing his decision in Shelby County: “There is no denying … that the conditions that originally justified these measures no longer characterize voting in the covered jurisdictions.” Arkansas, 2018: In 2014, 90-year-old Doris Pendleton and 93-year-old Susie Thomas received notices in the mail that their ballots would not count. The state had recently […]
read more

See more about: Shelby County

Related Posts

Never Count on the Supreme Court to Protect Voting Rights

US Politics / Liberal : The New Republic

Chief Justice John Roberts's decision in Shelby County v. Holder may be the most politically naïve decision of our era. Rooted in the notion that there simply isn't enough racism left in the United States to justify a full-functioni...

Losing the Right to Vote in Michigan

Politics / US Politics : Huffington Post: Politics Blog

Friends, Much has been justifiably made about the damage the Roberts Supreme Court has done to voting rights in their recent decision, Shelby County v. Holder. However, a potentially more insidious plot denying the precious right to...

More on the Transparent Indefensibility of Shelby County

Politics : Lawyers, Guns & Money

The reviews for John Roberts’s performance in striking down the Voting Rights Act keep coming! The decision cutting the heart out of the Voting Rights Act was also 5-to-4, but this time along more familiar lines, with Kennedy joinin...

John Roberts, Shelby County, and stare circulus jerkus

Politics : Lawyers, Guns & Money

I understand that Amel Ahmed is ultimately on the right side of the voting rights issue, but there is no context in which the phrase “John Roberts was right” should appear in a discussion of Shelby County, unless the question is whe...


Copyright © 2016 Regator, LLC