U.S. Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch on Monday chided their colleagues for passing up “another opportunity to end the “constitutionally suspect power of federal agencies to interpret their own regulations. ...
Jill Abramson goes back to reporting and gives us a long-form look at Clarence Thomas’s other accusers. She refers to Moira Smith’s story, very similar to Anita Hill’s, which was published in Fall 2016, just before James Comey made his news. Abramson wrote a book in the mid-nineties about “ three other women who had experiences […]
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is facing renewed controversy related to Anita Hill and the other women he allegedly harassed while holding a position of authority. A recent news story highlighted the fact that new-ish evidence surfaced which, if believed, would mean that Justice Thomas lied during his confirmation......
Decades before the #MeToo movement, and long before Time magazine honored “the Silence Breakers,” there was Anita Hill and Angela Wright. In 1991 both women were in Washington to accuse … Click to Continue »
The justice’s consistent pro-gun arguments fail to reconcile rights with their lived consequences.
Since his testy confirmation hearing in 1991, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has largely flown under the radar, rarely speaking during court cases. The post There’d Be No Justice Thomas if His Confirmation Was Today appeared first on The Good Men Project.
Do You Believe Her Now? It's time to reexamine the evidence that Clarence Thomas lied to get onto the Supreme Court -- and to talk seriously about impeachment. On the same fall night in 2016 that the infamous Access Hollywood tape featuring...Show More Summary
Jill Abramson revisits both the Anita Hill hearings, and Moria Smith’s October 2016 allegation that, in 1999, Thomas groped her several times at a work-related social event. The gist of Abramson’s argument, I think, is that while the conduct Hill and at least three other women accused Thomas of engaging in may not have been […]
The impeachment of Clarence Thomas is a pipe dream.
OBVIOUSLY, SHE’S MOTIVATED BY RACISM AND FEAR OF A STRONG BLACK MAN: Jill Abramson Reboots Her ‘High-Tech Lynching’ of Clarence Thomas. “She kicked up dirt to give the impression of scandal, which would not have been necessary had she actually uncovered proof of one. Meanwhile, she unintentionally presented stronger evidence of her sham than of […]
New York Magazine is laying out a case for the possible impeachment of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.
Thomas can’t seem to get three other conservative justices to get aggressive in defending gun rights. So he’s drawing attention to the problem.
Angela Wright-Shannon, a highly respected former editor, wrote a HuffPost essay detailing how she too had been harassed by Clarence Thomas.
Justice Clarence Thomas makes this stupid point so often that it was bound to drop after one mass shooting or another.
Justice Clarence Thomas, in a blistering dissent Tuesday, accused the U.S. Supreme Court of making the right to keep and bear arms "a constitutional orphan." The court turned down a challenge to California's waiting period for guns.
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas sounded like a talk radio host in his dissent to a challenge of California’s waiting period to buy guns. The top court refused to hear the challenge to California’s 10-day waiting period for firearms purchases, and two other justices agreed with Thomas to...
A second woman has accused Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas of sexual assault, and a campaign to impeach him is looming.
Should we get rid of a 69-year-old judge and let the Republicans replace him with some 25-year-old wingnut? It's a headscratcher!
The Supreme Court on Tuesday turned down a 2nd Amendment challenge to California’s mandatory 10-day waiting period for new gun purchases. With only Justice Clarence Thomas in dissent, the justices let stand a ruling of the 9th Circuit Court that called the California law a “reasonable safety precaution”...